辭職

          《讀賣新聞》對於南庫頁島「地位」（主權）的說明 The Daily Yomiuri describes the status of southern Sakhalin in “Territory issue 酒店打工thorn in Japan-Russia relations” “... 西裝外套 In 1945, the Soviet Union broke a mutual nonaggression treat 租房子y between Japan and the Soviet Union by invading and occupying southern Sakhalin. The Ja 情趣用品panese government abandoned its territorial claims on southern Sakhalin in the 1951 San Francisco Peace T 酒店工作reaty, which the Soviet Union did not take part in. The treaty also did not clarify which nation had sovereignty over the souther 商務中心n part of Sakhalin. The Japanese government has since maintained that it has not been decided under international law which country has sovereignty ove 賣房子r the southern part of Sakhalin...” http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/20090217TDY03106.htm 【Comment】 See, the military occupation, abandon territory in SFPT and y 室內設計et decided under international law etc. are exactly the same scenarios concering the status of Formosa and the Pescadores . 抗議澳門拒?南華早報攝影記者入境 table.MsoNormalTable {font-size:10.0 居酒屋pt;font-family:"Times New Roman";}日本從薩哈林2號獲取液化氣占該國進口總量7%　■俄新網（2009.02.18） .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 西服  .